|  
         Identified: 
           
           
          
        Discussions: 
        
          - Indeed it is Kuphus polythalamia (Linné, 1767), and 
            the year is not 1758, as I wrote to 'Jim', but as Harry stated, 1767 
            indeed. Back in the nineteen60's, when I was still employed by the 
            Rotterdam Natural History Museum (Holland), I discovered a complete 
            specimen of this species in the collection, meaning closed at the 
            'headside' and showing the two small openings at the 'tailside'. When 
            shaking the tube 'something' inside rattled, and after making a small 
            hole close to the 'headside' two almost complete valves and two palettes 
            could be taken out. These, I suppose, are still available in the Rotterdam 
            collection.
 
            ...Arie J. 
             
            
          -  
            
 Vermiculariidae, Serpula polythalamia. Linne' 1767. and the length 
              was 1185 mm overall. At the small end were two tubelets which I 
              assumed to be siphons or ??. The shell came to me by mail from an 
              anonymous donor. ( no return address ) but it was interesting to 
              note that it came shortly after I had been having some correspondence 
              from the desk of Dr Ballard at woods hole. The correspondence was 
              related to his discovery of the fumaroles found at great depth in 
              the ocean. and their surrounding life forms. 
              The shell came in four broken sections but the breaks were clean 
              and glued up with no visible trace. ... 
              Hope your injuries will heal soon. Don M. 
           
          -  
            
Definitely Kuphus polypthalmus, a calcareous tube made by a clam 
              related to shipworms (Family Teredidae). Found in the Philippines 
              (labels often say Cebu, but probably from elsewhere in the islands). 
              Very nice length: they do get to about 200 cm but the ones I've 
              seen for sale recently are more on the range of 70-80 cm. ... Batt 
              R. 
           
          - Mystery shell no. 1 is Kuphus polythalamia (Linné, 1767: 
            1266; sp. 803). See < http://www.jaxshells.org/xray.htm>. 
            ... Harry L. 
            
          
 
          -  
            
            There is ample reason for the confusion of these two dates in this 
            case:
 
            The genus Serpula was introduced by in his Vermes Testacea by Linnaeus 
            (1758: 786; Genus 298) to accommodate animals which constructed a 
            calcareous tubular shell. It has become apparent that this was polyphyletic 
            taxon composed of gastropods (Vermetidae), pelecypods (Clavagellidae 
            and Teredinidae), and tubicolous annelids. Workers seemed to be divided 
            in their treatment of Serpula (annelid vs. mollusk) for many years. 
            Finally, the nominal taxon was assigned to the Annelida by Heppell 
            (1963) [ICZN (1966)], who designated Serpula vermicularis Linnaeus, 
            1767 as its type species. Since Serpula is the type genus of Serpulidae 
            Johnston, 1865, the implications of this action are rather extensive.
            Of the 17 species of Serpula introduced by the author (Linnaeus, 
              1758: 786-788; spp. 690-703; Linné, 1767: 1264-167; spp. 
              791-806), S. arenaria (Linnaeus, 1758: 787; sp. 699) and S. polythalamia 
              (Linné, 1767: 1266; sp. 803), are relevant to the problem 
              at hand. Linnaeus gave three indications for Serpula arenaria: Buonanni 
              (1864: pl. 20 fig. C), Rumph (1705, 1741: pl. 41 fig. E Solen arenarius; 
              see also Beekman, 1999: 175), and Gualtieri (1742: pl. 10, figs 
              L and N). As pointed out by Hanley (1855: 447-448), the co-opting 
              of the species epithet notwithstanding, the Rumph figure can be 
              removed from consideration as it is the only indication for Serpula 
              polythalamia Linné, 1767. There has been general consensus 
              (e.g., Keen, 1971) on the identity of the latter Linnaean taxon 
              [Pelecypoda: Teredinidae: Kuphus Guettard (1770: 139-143; pl. 69, 
              fig. 8)], of which it is the type species (SD Gray, 1847: 188). 
              Nonetheless, Zammit Maempel (1993: 159) argued that Kuphus arenarius 
              (Linnaeus, 1758) is the valid name for the this biologic taxon, 
              stating "Linné (1758, p. 787, paragraph 699) - perhaps 
              considering Kuphus to be a serpulid - referred to the animal as 
              Serpula arenaria, a name which he subsequently (1767, p. 1266) changed 
              to Serpula polythalamia. In 1770, Guettard introduced the genus 
              Kuphus for the worm-like mollusc Solen arenarius of Rumphius, and 
              Kuphus polythalamia became the entrenched name for the living species. 
              However, according to the ICZN rules, the 1758 name is valid despite 
              Linné's own correction in 1767. Hence the animal should be 
              referred to as Kuphus polythalamia (Linné, 1758)." My 
              interpretation of The Code (ICZN, 1999) differs greatly from that 
              of Zammit Maempel (who, BTW, is from Malta) and I consider Kuphus 
              arenarius (Linnaeus, 1758) of authors to be an incorrect generic 
              assignment. 
            A second cloud surrounding Serpula arenaria Linnaeus, 1758 is its 
              taxonomic placement at the phylum (Mollusca:Vermetidae vs. Annelida:Polychaeta), 
              generic, and specific level. The two Linnaean indications (Buonanni 
              and Gualtieri) are similar and appear more consistent with a large 
              vermetid than a tubicolous annelid. Of further relevance is the 
              fact that these two citations were listed, among others, as representing 
              Vermetus gigas Bivona Bernardi (1832b: 5; pl. 2 figs. 1, 2) in its 
              original description. In his discussion of V. gigas, Philippi (1836: 
              170; pl. 19, figs. 18, 18a), also cited these two pre-Linnaean indications 
              along with Linné (1764: 700; sp. 432) and "Serpula arenaria 
              L. Gm. 3743," which latter two entities are nothing more than 
              S. arenaria Linnaeus, 1758, the later one including an expanded 
              discussion and additional figures. Among other early authors, Hanley 
              (1855: 447) considered S. arenaria to be a vermetid and wrote: "a 
              specimen of it is still preserved in the cabinet of Linnaeus (who 
              has recorded his possession of an example of arenaria)." Kathie 
              Way (pers. comm., 7 Sept., 2009): "In a Linnaean tin box containing 
              a variety of unmarked vermetid tubes is one which matches specimens 
              labelled 'Vermetus gigas Bivona, Marseille' in the B.M.Coll. It 
              is unmarked, but Linné has placed a dash by the number of 
              the species in his annot. Ed.12 Syst. Nat. indicating that he possessed 
              the species." Although this revelation does not tie that or 
              any other specimen(s) to the original description, it nonetheless 
              further militates against placement of S. arenaria in the Annelida. 
              Recently Smriglio [1997: 152-153; species 640 a,b, 641, 642 as Serpulorbis 
              arenaria (Linné, 1767); more properly: Serpulorbis arenarius 
              (Linnaeus, 1758)] applied the Linnean name to a large Mediterranean 
              vermetid. Although the format of this work precluded a chresonymy, 
              this taxon is clearly synonymous with the species often referred 
              to Vermetus gigas Bivona Bernardi, 1832b as first noted in the early 
              Nineteenth Century (vide supra). Smriglio's interpretation also 
              follows Gray (1847: 156), Cossmann (1912: 138), and Keen (1961: 
              190), all of who designated the Linnaean taxon a senior synonym 
              of the type species of Serpulorbis Sassi (1827: 482; Serpulorbis 
              polyphragma Sassi, 1827 by monotypy). Thus the weight of evidence 
              supports the following placement of Serpula arenaria Linnaeus: Mollusca: 
              Vermetidae: Serpulorbis with Serpulorbis polyphragma Sassi, 1827 
              and Vermetus gigas Bivona Bernardi, 1832 as junior synonyms. 
            No room for biblio, Harry L. 
             
             
           
         
          
       |